Co-funded by:
7th framework programme of the European Commission, DG MOVE


http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html

European Rail Traffic management system ERTMS

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.7 / Subcat-No.7.4-3


General Information

Title

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.7 / Subcat-No.7.4-3

Category

7. Research and innovation

Subcategory

7.4 Framework: transport safety

Transport policy measure (TPM)

European Rail Traffic management system ERTMS

Description of TPM

More than 20 (national) signalling and speed control system in rail operation existed throughout Europe in the past. These technical barriers should be removed by the ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System), which aims to increase the competitiveness and dynamism of the rail sector. Further, it aims at promoting the integration of rail freight and passenger market. The ERTMS aims to harmonise the signalling and speed control system throughout the EU rail transport infrastructure.
The ERMTS system consists of two core components:
1. GSM-R (Global System for Mobiles - Railway): This component is based on standard GSM but using various frequencies specific for rail as well as certain advanced functions. It is a radio system used for exchanging voice and data information between the track and the train.
2. ETCS (European Train Control System):The European Train Control System makes it possible not only to transmit permitted speed information to the train driver, but also constantlyto monitor the driver’s compliance with these instructions. The ETCS consists of two modules, one trackside and the other on board. The trackside module transmits information which enables the on-board computer to calculate, at any given moment, the maximum permitted speed.
The on-board computer slows down the train automatically if this speed is exceeded. The ETCS guarantees a common standard that enables trains to cross national borders and enhances safety.
There are key prerequisites for a successful implementation of ERTMS, which are: the specifications needed to be widely accepted and applied, the establishment of an central managementa and the strict compatibility of the system. [EE]
There exist three levels of the ETCS system: Level 1 contains the most "simple" information exchange system, which transmits information from radiobeacons along the track to the train driver regarding maximum speed. In Level 2 the information for trains is transmitted by GSM-R, the position is still detected by track.
The lineside signals are not longer neccessary, which allows a reduction of investments and maintenance costs. At level 3 the trains are able to submit their position and speed themselves which allows an optimisation of capacity and further reduction of track equipment.

Implementation examples

- Rotterdam - Genova rail freight corridor [4]
- Germany: Berlin – Jüterbog –Halle/Leipzig [9]
- UK: Cambrian Coast Line, a single track line of 215km, between Shrewsbury (Sutton Bridge Junction), Aberystwyth and Pwllheli in Wales. [10]

Objectives of TPM

- Increase rail safety by an effective signalling system with automatic train speed control
- Ensure the technical interoperability of rail system throughout Europe
- Increase competitiveness and dynamism of the rail sector
- Stimulate the European rail equipment market
- Optimisation of distance between running trains and capacity increase
- RAMS: Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, Safety

Choice of transport mode / Multimodality

ERTMS will facilitate an increase in the market share of European rail transport. This in turn is expected to create a more competitive market of suppliers, and to reduce the costs of railways in the long term. [3] More international (rail) freight services.

Origin and/or destination of trip

Trip frequency

The capacity of rail infrastructure will increase due to less distances between trains. Capacity gains in terms of infrastructure usage. [1]

Choice of route

Timing (day, hour)

Occupancy rate / Loading factor

Capacity gain in terms of infrastructure use [1]

Energy efficiency / Energy usage

Circulation of freight trains will be smoother: less variations in speed and indirectly affected by modal shift.

Main source

[1] European Commission (2005): Communication from the Commission to the European parliament and the council on the deployment of the European rail signalling system ERTMS/ETCS. COM(2005)298 final
[2] European Commission (2005): The ERTMS in 10 questions. MEMO/05/235, Brussels
[3] European Commission (2006): ERTMS – Delivering flexible and reliable rail traffic. - A major industrial project for Europe. Brussels 2006
[4] Obrenovic et al. (2006); European Transport Conference: Proceedings of the ETC; Migration of the European Train control system (ETCS) and the impacts on the international transport markets
[5] de Tilière; Interoperability in Europe: Case of the ERTMS development in the new European rail market; Association for European Transport 2004
[6] International Union of railways - UIC (2003): Implementing the European Train Control System ETCS: Opportunities for European Rail Corridors;
[7] Institution of railway signal engineers (IRSE) (2003): Proceedings 2002/2003
[8] Ministry of transport, public works and water management of the Netherlands (2010): Social Cost Benefit Analysis of implementation strategies for ERTMS in the Netherlands
[9] European Commission (2009): Nationaler Umsetzungsplan für die TSI Zugsteuerung, Zugsicherung und Signalgebung des konventionellen transeuropäischen Eisenbahnsystems im Rahmen der Richtlinie 2001/16/EG in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland".
[10] Department for Transport (2007): ERTMS National Implementation Plan.

Traffic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Travel or transport time

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Risk of congestion

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Vehicle mileage

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Service and comfort

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

- Service and comfort improvements because of less delays and higher track capacity (also on local regional level).
- Less risks of delay because of standardised technical systems (also on local / regional level).
- Modal shift towards railway (primarily freight) due to a harmonised railway control system which increases the vehicle mileage. [4]
- ETCS/ERTMS will not be able to improve the performance siginificantly, combined with other measures the operational structure can be optimised. [4]
- ERMTS /ETCS will will be able to reduce transport time and increase punctuality on international relations significantly. [4]
- Travel time benefits for cargo operators & clients, in some specific cases also for travellers [8]

Quantification of impacts

- ECTS gains capacity of 20% compared to the existing less efficient system. [1]
- Increase of rail market share (example Rotterdam - Genova) from 22% to 28%, travel time from 22h to 18h, punctuality from 70% to 85%. [4]

Economic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Transport costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Private income / commercial turn over

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Revenues in the transport sector

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sectoral competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Spatial competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Housing expenditures

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Insurance costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Health service costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public authorities & adm. burdens on businesses

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public income (e.g.: taxes, charges)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Third countries and international relations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

- High investments/asset costs for railway operators. [4]
- Need for parallel coexisting signalling systems on train and/or track (old system and ETCS systems) due to impossible simultaneous ETCS installation on all trains and tracks. Maintenance costs will increase in short terms. [4]
- Reduction of costs for implementing traditional and obsolete systems and maintenance of these.
Potential cost savings for operators (benefit): - Lower project costs (small); - Lower procurement costs (small)
Potential cost savings for infrastructure owners / managers: - No line-side signals (level 2,3) (strong); - Lower project costs (small); - Lower procurment costs (small)
Cost drivers for operators: - Inadequate overall planning (small); - Sunk costs for premature desinvestment of existing control command (CC) systems (small);
Retrofit of existing vehicles (medium); - Specific transfer modules (STM) or other parallel equipment for existing CC-systems (small)
Cost drivers for infrastructure owners (here public bodies): - Inadequate overall planning (small),- Sunk costs for premature disinvestment of existing control command (CC) systems (small); - Additional costs for fall back CC systems to be built (medium) [all 6]

Operation phase

- Reduction of investments for trainsets
Potential cost savings for operators (benefit): - Synergy in use of GSM-R (level2) (medium); - Increase of safety (small); - Reduced number of international trainsets (medium); - Reduction of on board equipment (small);
Potential costs savings for infrastructure owners / IM (here public bodies): - No track occupancy detection (level 3) (strong); - Synergy in use of GSM-R (level2) (medium); - Less maintenance on trackside (small); - Better use of infrastructure (medium); - Increase of safety (small).

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

- ERTMS will facilitate an increase in the market share of European rail transport.This in turn is expected to create a more competitive market of suppliers and to reduce the costs of railways in the long term. [3] [4] [8] Thus competitiveness of railways (freight and passengers) will increase on spatial and sectoral level.
- The costs of ETCS, used on its own, are appreciably lower than those of conventional systems [1] . After implementation the ERTMS will have lower maintenance costs and thus positive impact for public income (if infrastructure management financed by public body). [4]
- Increase of cost efficiency / lower asset costs for train operating company (TOC) because of rising competitveness on supply markets (one system for several markets) and lower access barriers. Lower operation (asset) costs for infrastructure managers (IM). [4]
- Improved planning of rolling stock operations [7]
- Complicated and cost- intensive certification process of ECTS result in higher asset costs and product prices [4]

Quantification of impacts

- Reduction of costs for trainset of Thalys by 60%. [1]
- Retrofitting of tracks would cost up to 80% extra due to difficulties of installtion of system during operation. [1]
- Train costs will increase by up to factor 3, if ETCS is not integrated in traction unit from the outset. [1]
- Investments costs of about €5bn for equipping trains and part of infrastructure by EU. [1]
ERTMS / ETCS ROI savings (in M€ per year) in Europe:
- safety of the railway: > 200 (strong impact) and at level crossings: >300 (strong impact)
- mainenance of signalling: >2000 (strong impact)
- productivity of the rolling stock: >1000, (medium impact)
- energy savings of signalling: >200 (small impact)
- maintenance saved on rolling stock: >600 (medium impact)
- savings on track works: >200 (strong impact)
- increase in freight traffic: >1000 (small impact)
- increase in passenger traffic: >1000 (small impact) [all 5, based on 7 (published 2003]
- The cost of the onboard module depends on the type of locomotives or train sets. In terms of an order of magnitude, this cost would be around €100 000 for new equipment, prices vary between €200 000 and €300 000 when existing equipment has to be adapted. Infrastructure: The range is rather wide, and estimates vary between €30 000 and €300 000 per kilometre. [2]

Social Impacts
Environmental Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Air pollutants

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Noise emissions

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Visual quality of the landscape

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Land use

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Climate

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Renewable or non-renewable resources

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Less negative external impacts (like noise and energy consumption), assuming that noise emissions produced by rail are comparably lower than road.

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

- Less air pollutants because of strengthening the rail sector and thus higher demand. [8]
- Positive impacts for the climate by modal change.
- Possible reduced use of non-renewable resources by modal shift (depending on the source of electricity in the rail sector)

Quantification of impacts


0  Comments

Write a comment for this page

Response to:  Direct response to the article