Co-funded by:
7th framework programme of the European Commission, DG MOVE


http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html

Reduction of TEN-T network missing links

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.3 / Subcat-No.3.1


General Information

Title

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.3 / Subcat-No.3.1

Category

3. Infrastructure

Subcategory

3.1 TEN-T cross border missing links

Transport policy measure (TPM)

Reduction of TEN-T network missing links

Description of TPM

The Trans-European Transport Networks are a planned set of road, rail, air and water transport networks in Europe. The TEN-T networks are part of a wider system of Trans-European Networks, including a telecommunications network and a proposed energy network. The European Commission adopted the first action plans on trans-European networks in 1990.TEN-T envisages coordinated improvements to primary roads, railways, inland waterways, airports, seaports, inland ports and traffic management systems, providing integrated and intermodal long-distance, high-speed routes. A decision to adopt TEN-T was made by the European Parliament and Council in July 1996. The EU works to promote the networks by a combination of leadership, coordination, issuance of guidelines and funding aspects of development.The TEN-T policy has helped to complete a large number of projects of common interest, interconnecting national networks and overcoming technological barriers across national borders. Amongst the success stories is the high-speed railway line linking Paris, Brussels, Cologne/Frankfurt, Amsterdam and London. It has not only interconnected national networks and marked a breakthrough of a new generation of railway traffic across borders, but it has also provided citizens and business travellers with a competitive travel option within Europe. The wide consultation process, the external expertise, the ex-post assessments conducted and the internal analysis used over the last two years have shown that the European Union does not dispose yet of a complete trans-European infrastructure network, and especially not for rail and inland waterways, where essential parts are still missing and constitute important bottlenecks. The infrastructure network in the EU today is indeed fragmented, both from a geographical and a multi-modal perspective. It is also not sufficiently integrated in the international trade flows that feed the European internal market. Despite important efforts towards improvement, European rail and inland waterway networks are still lacking capacity and efficiency [2].

Implementation examples

- Construction of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T)
- Facilitating the implementation of certain multi-country rail projects
- Accelerated implementation of priority TEN (financed by fuel tax or by SMCP tolls)
- Fast TEN-T implementation funded by additional fuel tax revenues- TEN-T and the Marco Polo programme

Objectives of TPM

-Reduction of GHG emissions
-Drastic decrease in the oil dependency ratio
-Limit the growth of congestion
The overall aim of the TPM is to provide by 2030 for the establishment of a complete and integrated TEN-T that would maximise the value added for Europe of the network. This optimal network would cover and link all EU Member States in an intermodal and interoperable manner. This network would also provide links to neighbouring and third countries, as well as all transport modes and systems that would support the move towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system by 2050.
This aim is consistent with the 'Inclusion Growth' initiative of Europe 2020, the Single Market Act and with the general goal of the TEN-T policy; to improve the competitiveness of the EU economy as a whole, to support the completion of the internal market, and to contribute to a balanced territorial development of the Union. [2]

Choice of transport mode / Multimodality

Significant improvement in choice of transport mode due to complete, competitive networks for all modes (rail, iww, road)

Origin and/or destination of trip

No impact

Trip frequency

No impact

Choice of route

Traffic attracted on the network

Timing (day, hour)

No impact

Occupancy rate / Loading factor

No impact

Energy efficiency / Energy usage

Significant improvement of energy efficiency and usage due to smart administrative processes and complete network

Main source

[1] Emory's (2007): Ex ante evaluation of the TEN-T Multi Annual Programme 2007-2013, Framework Contract for Ex-ante evaluations and Impact Assessments (TREN/A1/46-2005) FINAL REPORT- 2.
[2] European Commission (2011): SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying document to the WHITE PAPER Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system SEC(2011) 358 final, SEC(2011) 391 final, COM(2011) 144 final
[3] European Commission (2011): Impact Assessment, Accompanying the document Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on Union Guidelines for the development of the Trans-European Transport Network COM(2011) 650 final, SEC(2011) 1213 final
[4] European Investment Bank (2006): Evaluation of Cross-border TEN Projects, European Investment Bank.

Traffic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Travel or transport time

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Risk of congestion

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Vehicle mileage

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Service and comfort

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

Eliminating cross border missing links will provide seamless traffic flows (both for passenger and freight) on the TEN-T network, the result will be reduced transport times, decreased vehicle mileage, risk of congestion and better service. [3]

Quantification of impacts


Economic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Transport costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Private income / commercial turn over

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Revenues in the transport sector

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sectoral competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Spatial competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Housing expenditures

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Insurance costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Health service costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public authorities & adm. burdens on businesses

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public income (e.g.: taxes, charges)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Third countries and international relations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

The measures support regional development and economic growth as well as sectoral competitiveness for rail, iwiw, and road sector as well, see description and traffic impacts. Due to reduced congestion and time savings, transport costs decrease significantly. Also provides better accessibility to third countries (like Hungary used to be, now Croatia). [4]]

Quantification of impacts


Social Impacts
Environmental Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Air pollutants

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Noise emissions

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Visual quality of the landscape

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Land use

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Climate

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Renewable or non-renewable resources

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

The measure is aiming at reducing GHG emission and noise level, while the reduction of carbon dioxide emission makes possible to realize significant improvement in climate change effects.

Quantification of impacts


0 Comments

Write a comment for this page

Response to:  Direct response to the article