Co-funded by:
7th framework programme of the European Commission, DG MOVE


http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html

Environmentally differentiated landing fees

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.1 / Subcat-No.1.2-2


General Information

Title

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.1 / Subcat-No.1.2-2

Category

1. Pricing

Subcategory

1.2 Internalisation of external costs

Transport policy measure (TPM)

Environmentally differentiated landing fees

Description of TPM

International air transport involves considerable adverse effects on the environment at both a national and an international level, which, particularly against the background of high rates of growth in the volume of air transport in recent years. While at a global level discussion focuses on the impact on climate change, at a local level the focus is on noise emissions. Particularly due to growing traffic volume, increasing efforts are being directed at problems of noise mitigation, and economic instruments are becoming even more important. One promising option is the creation of economic incentives for the use of environmentally sound technologies (with less noise and lower emissions) by airlines. To stimulate the use of silent or less noisy aircraft and to discourage the use of noisy aircrafts, many airports apply a pricing differentiation over and above the base landing and take-off charge.

Implementation examples

Currently, there are landing charges in Sweden and Switzerland concerning NOx. Moreover, noise based differentiation of landing fees (night fees, noise categories) are implemented in the UK (eg Heathrow), the Netherlands (eg Schiphol), Germany (eg Frankfurt).

Objectives of TPM

Main objectives are:
• promote environmentally responsible behaviours by encouraging airlines to use aircraft with lower noise and air quality impacts
• to stimulate airlines to take into account as one factor among many, the emission fees when choosing new engines for their new aircraft
• If all EU airports introduce emission charges, the incentive to adopt cleaner engines would be stronger
• Orientation towards the polluter-pays principle through the separate treatment of take-off and landing, (higher pricing at night ) as well as greater differentiation of noise categories [1,2,3]

Choice of transport mode / Multimodality

Origin and/or destination of trip

Trip frequency

Choice of route

Timing (day, hour)

Night fees simulate airlines to operate less flights at night

Occupancy rate / Loading factor

Environmental fees could incentify airlines to increase occupancy rate.

Energy efficiency / Energy usage

Main source

[1] Kalle Keldusild (2006): Aviation Working Group. NOx–differentiated landing charges in Sweden.
[2] Civil Aviation Authority Netherlands (2003): Airport charges of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Transport and Water Management Inspectorate, Division Aircraft, Technical and Airworthiness Standards Department
[3] Heathrow Airport Limited (2010): Heathrow Airport Structure of Aeronautical Charges Proposals
[4] Öko-Institut e. V (2004): Economic measures for the reduction of the environmental impact of air transport: noise-related landing charges
[5] European Commission (2002): Conference on good pratice in integration of environment into transport policy, DG Environment

Traffic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Travel or transport time

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Risk of congestion

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Vehicle mileage

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Service and comfort

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

Due to higher transport costs, demand, and vehicle mileage will possibly decrease [not mentioned in sources]

Quantification of impacts


Economic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Transport costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Private income / commercial turn over

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Revenues in the transport sector

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sectoral competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Spatial competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Housing expenditures

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Insurance costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Health service costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public authorities & adm. burdens on businesses

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public income (e.g.: taxes, charges)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Third countries and international relations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

The measure inspires airlines to buy low noise level and less pollutant emitting aircrafts, however the costs are definitely higher than conventional ones. Sectoral competitiveness decreases for airline transport (due to increased transport costs), spatial competitiveness increases between airport with and without limits (and thus differentiated landing fees).

Quantification of impacts


Social Impacts
Environmental Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Air pollutants

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Noise emissions

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Visual quality of the landscape

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Land use

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Climate

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Renewable or non-renewable resources

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

Reduction of air pollutants climate and noise level, due to more environmental friendly engines

Quantification of impacts


0 Comments

Write a comment for this page

Response to:  Direct response to the article